MSI Press Blog

  In today’s polarized climate, the Constitution is often invoked not as a shared foundation, but as a rhetorical weapon. Phrases like “constitutional rights” or “freedom” are hurled in debates with little regard for context, precedent, or nuance. This isn’t just bad faith—it’s bad history. And it erodes the very discourse that sustains democracy. ⚖️ The Danger of Absolutism Extremist movements tend to speak in absolutes: “The Constitution says…” (without citing case law or historical interpretation) “Freedom means…” (without acknowledging competing rights or responsibilities) “We’re just defending liberty” (while undermining institutions that protect it) This kind of rhetoric shuts down conversation. It replaces inquiry with ideology. And it turns a document meant to unify into a tool for division. 🧩 The Constitution as a Collaborative Text The Constitution was never meant to be interpreted in isolation. It’s shaped by: Judicial precedent : Centuries of case law that refine its m...

  Excerpt from  When Liberty Enslave  by Jerry Aveta Book Description: There is a common experience between our experiences today and those before the Civil War many years ago.  The effect of the intersection of faith and politics during these two experiences has had on our elections and our governance is uncanny in their similarities.  Both times an election insurrection was stopped by the sitting vice president.  Both times had people of the same faith on both sides of the social issues of the day claiming God’s favor and willing to divide the nation over those competing positions. Part 1 of this writing focuses on the Civil War era and how liberty centered around the issue of equality.  Some people of faith believed all men were equal, some did not. Part 2 focuses on our present times and how liberty centers on the sanctity of life concerning abortion and gun control.  Some in our nation feel enslaved by the liberty of others. Part 3 describes ...