A Publisher's Conversation with Authors: Why publishers do not share with authors the reason for turning down their manuscripts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6f3f/a6f3fcb436cb5dbb6cf63152b43fb2f8231e6dbd" alt="Image"
It is Tuesday. Monday's madness is over, and Wednesday will take us over the hump, so Tuesday it is--for some serious discussion with authors. Tuesday talks mean to address authors in waiting and self-published authors who would like to go a more traditional route or who would at least like to take their steps with a publisher by their side. This week's conversation addresses the reason(s) that publishers almost never tell authors why a book was rejected. Typical, instead, authors whose works have been rejected will simply receive a short note that the book does not fit the publisher's needs without expressing how it does not fit or what those needs are. There are a few reasons why a publisher will not elucidate a rationale. (1) The book really does not fit the publishing lines. Nuff said there. Sending a book about sports to a religious publisher -- it does happen (a lot) -- is a clear lack of fit and additional explanation is not needed. (2) The publisher does not have ...