Daily Excerpt: Rainstorm of Tomorrow (Dong) - Preface
Preface
“Philosophy is dead,” declared Stephen Hawking in
agreement with many others. “As philosophers have not kept up with science,
their art is dated” (Warman, 2011). However, if we refer to the history of how
humans peruse knowledge, we will not find that different disciplines replaced
one another in sequence. It is not that the wilt of religion gave rise to
philosophy, or that the denouement of philosophy set the stage for science—nor
is the world segmented into discrete, incompatible disciplinary fields. A
biological reaction can be expanded to millions of chemical reactions or trillions
of interactions between physical particles; likewise, the emergence of “social
behaviors” among neural networks as they grow and that of “tacit agreement” from
quantum entanglement have implied the possibility of adopting a sociological
language to explain phenomena previously deemed as lifeless and strictly
adherent to the laws of physics. Every discipline is a language capable of
encompassing all phenomena in the world. Each speaks with a unique voice. In
practice, however, we rarely lean on one discipline alone to explain everything
around us. For example, we are not likely to use the language of physics—despite
its sufficiency—to restore psychological activities to the interminable and
trivial interactions of physical particles, on account of its low efficiency
and incapacity to provide us with a holistic view. With the advancement of
disciplinary differentiation, individual pieces of knowledge are often
restrained to the little patch of his/her own specialty. For one to grasp the
world in an all-encompassing picture, we need to weave the threads of different
disciplines together; that tapestry is called the philosophy of science.
Rainstorm of
Tomorrow: The Ever-Flowing Banquet of Philosophy is a book that dexterously weaves the storied
philosophical themes of truth, ethics, and aesthetics
together with the theories of relativity, quantum mechanics, neuroscience,
epigenetics, social Darwinism, utilitarianism, evolutionary psychology, and
modern art—from the soberest rationality to the wildest conjecture—to generate
provocative or even alienating discourse on topics that you might otherwise
regard yourself as being familiar with, and challenge you to re-think any
settled positions that you may take for granted.
Part One, Truth, begins with an intriguing, playful metaphor—the tree
growing into the soil with its roots buried in the air—to approach a subject
that might otherwise have seemed too abstract or philosophical: the knowability
of the world of nature. Does such a reversed perspective of the tree defy the existence of the world-in-itself in a manner akin to
the counterintuitive theories advanced by quantum mechanics? If not, then how
does the mirrored image challenge the language we use to describe the objective
nature of the world? The chapters in Part One cope with these questions by scrutinizing
the relationship between body and mind—also called
matter and energy nowadays—as being simply the head and tail of the same coin.
Further recruiting the theory of relativity, Part One ends by presenting the astonishing
similarities across distant spatial and temporal scales and proposing the possibility of the
universe as the inner cavity of a giant creature—as opposed to its
stereotypical consideration as infinite and boundless. This take on truth
imparts an almost mystical sense of what it is to be human, to be in this
world, and to be conscious of the many ways we can apprehend it.
Part Two, Ethics, conceives of the ultimate meaning of present human existence
as ensuring its continuation into the future: namely, existence for existence’s sake. It interprets utilitarianism as a
tool to achieve this goal in a biological language: as the drive underlying
instinctive behaviors, including survival and reproduction. The chapters in
this part, then, elaborate upon the complicated manifestation of utilitarianism,
represented by the deceptively simple principle of gaining advantage and avoiding
harm, which is demonstrated by the conformity to
utilitarianism by anti-utilitarian events and the violation of utilitarianism
by seemingly utilitarian events. Through an eclectic selection of material from
philosophy, psychology, genetic engineering, Chinese fables, Japanese anime,
and Western dystopian novels, Part Two provides a multi-faceted, cross-cultural
examination of what leading a “perfect” life means as well as how the
possibilities for doing so will change in the future and what inherent tensions
exist between self-fulfillment and social engagement. While addressing these
questions, Part Two does not hesitate to broach controversial issues, such as
whether humans will eventually evolve into immortals or ascend the throne of
God.
Part Three, Aesthetics, probes the essence of beauty, art,
and the existence of a standard aesthetic paradigm. It begins by describing many renditions of a tree, an object already
familiar to you, and explains why such eye broccoli as analogs of modern art are
more likely to be regarded as purely aesthetic objects than others exhibiting
exterior beauty by stressing the transcendence of the utilitarian interest of
aesthetics. The
opposite of beauty is not ugliness but rather indifference and the cessation of
work when the creation itself has no utilitarian purpose. The chapters in this
part further speculate
as to why preferences
for some aesthetic concepts are universal while others may vary from person to
person. Evolutionary psychology ascribes the establishment of universal
aesthetic concepts to conflicts of interest in primitive human society, the
origin of which having been long forgotten across centuries of memory
inheritance. Memory is inheritable through our “encephalic waterpipes,” made of
semi-plastic, shape-memory alloys, which are
gradually bent into different shapes under the continuous scouring of the
everchanging environment and consequently generate diverse aesthetic paradigms.
However, in the case of life-and-death, these flexible waterpipes will be
restored to their original shape, manufactured from the same old mold, ensuring
that any human is capable of employing an adequate stress reaction in response
to threatening circumstances. Such conditioned reflexes are carved bone-deep
into our memories in the form of beauty.
Overall, this volume casts light on philosophical
questions that are described in scientific contexts but are ultimately beyond
the reach of science—the type of questions that can be addressed but not
answered so long as we hold to our position as human beings. That being said,
philosophy remains one of the most frFustrating disciplines in that it welcomes
questions but evades answers. This never-perishing sense of frustration is
symbolized by the book title, the everlasting Rainstorm of Tomorrow, which is
not something to eliminate but rather to hail as the ultimate driver of human
civilization.
The way that human civilization advances is
sometimes described as the Red Queen’s race. In a room that is constantly
rolling backward, “it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same
place” (Carroll,1993,
p. 161). Many implications can be derived from this metaphor. First, how did
this ecosystem come into being? Did the Red Queen enchant the ground to roll
back first and then shut all kinds of species into the room in a nightmarish
game of survival? Or was the initially static room set in motion by the
disarrayed species themselves, with those unlucky enough to have run obliquely
or opposite to the mainstream direction digging their own graves? In other
words, did our ecosystem evolve into its present form spontaneously without any
initial push or design? Human scientists are trying to unveil the origin of our
evolution by exploring the necessary conditions that trigger artificial
intelligence (AI).
Moreover, how fast can human beings evolve? The
answer is the average backward speed of the room. While humans, as a front
runner, have been accelerating the rotating speed and bringing those who can
barely keep up with the pace to the brink of extinction, our evolutionary speed
is also encumbered by the slower footpaces of other species, since the average
speed of the room depends on all. Why do we choose to stay inside the room
then? This is because we, as humans, share a symbiotic but nonidentical interest
with the will-to-live, a term frequently mentioned in Part Two, Ethics.
While the will-to-live treats us with happiness in the form of social
recognition whenever our ability increases, it ultimately aggregates individual
achievements into collective progress that advances the continuous evolution of
mankind. On the other hand, most members of the human race are only willing to
invest a marginal effort for progress at the cost of indulgence since they aim
for happiness instead of evolution. As a result, we satisfy ourselves with being
at the front of the room and exploiting livestock for our welfare. While few
pay attention to what the Red Queen said next, “if you want to get somewhere else,
you must run at least twice as fast as that,” we must ask what happened to
those who did run twice as fast or those who simply ran too fast to care about
the cheers of others. They stepped outside the front door and disappeared from
the sight of the public who remained inside, much like the others who ran too
slowly and slid out the back door. We must acknowledge that the greatest men
who ever existed are not those we celebrate today but those who have remain
unknown across the long course of history. Imagine someone who advocated animal
rights when even slaves were traded as commodities or someone who studied the elemental
building block of the world back in the Stone Age. The records of their
thoughts were long weathered and annihilated before any successor could
possibly recognize and appreciate their value. Human wisdom drives us forward,
whereas the upper limit of human wisdom—the inability to comprehend theories
outside the room—imprisons us.
It was on insomnia-plagued nights that I journeyed into Rainstorm of Tomorrow: The Ever-Flowing Banquet of Philosophy to record cogitations stranger than fiction: the culprits behind my stolen sleep; the raging beasts of thought who know no weariness until the relief of dawn; the rebellious, nocturnal souls shed of daytime attire as social elites. On these nights, I could not stop wondering what those prophets experienced outside the room where the mass resided. Maybe they broke into another room of greater elimination speed and fiercer competition. Embattled by endless challenges and triumphs, they may lose themselves in the heavy fog of nihilism. Nihility is a pack of opportunistic wolves lurking in the shadows, leaving restless hunters in ravenous hollows. To eat or be eaten, hunters set out on a journey that is at once futile, halfway, and paradoxical. They scaled a mountain and turned back halfway, not because the scenery on the summit lacked beauty, but because it is just as beautiful. They hailed the sea to find no answer. No answer is the answer. They sold a field of flowers and told the world of miseries. They exploited every possibility the world could offer but did not indulge in any of them. Until then, they were banners for an epiphany: how narrow the world is compared to the immense potential of what life could be. A pity that most men, for fear of a wolf attack, curl themselves up inside a tin box named purpose and significance.
For more posts by and about Renyuan Dong and his award-winning book, click HERE.
Available from Amazon and other online stores. On sale at MSI Press webstore at discount.
Sign up for the MSI Press LLC newsletter
Follow MSI Press on Twitter, Face Book, and Instagram.
in exchange for reviewing a current or forthcoming MSI Press LLC book?
Contact editor@msipress.com.
Want an author-signed copy of this book?
Purchase the book at 25% discount (use coupon code FF25)
and concurrently send a written request to orders@msipress.com.
Comments
Post a Comment