Moral Absolutism
The Civil War was fueled by competing moral visions of what America should be. Each side believed it was defending the nation’s true soul — not merely a policy preference, but a moral imperative. That absolutism made compromise impossible; to yield even an inch felt like surrendering the very meaning of the country. Today, we see echoes of that same rigidity. Our public discourse has grown brittle, shaped by a belief that compromise is betrayal, that nuance is weakness, that the “other side” is not just wrong but dangerous. Moral certainty has become a kind of armor — a way to signal purity, loyalty, and belonging. But armor also restricts movement. It keeps us from reaching toward one another, from imagining solutions that don’t fit neatly into ideological boxes. The tragedy is that most Americans are not extremists. They are simply afraid of being misunderstood, misrepresented, or morally condemned. So they retreat into camps where the rules are clear and the enemies are obvious. The...