Christianity and Christian Nationalism: Where They Meet—and Where They Do Not

 


The words Christianity and Christian nationalism are often used as though they describe the same thing. They do not.

There is an intersection between the two, certainly. Christian nationalism draws much of its language, symbolism, moral vocabulary, and sense of history from Christianity. Many people who identify with Christian nationalism are Christians, and some Christians embrace particular ideas associated with Christian nationalism.

But the two concepts are neither identical nor inseparable.

Understanding the difference requires asking a deceptively simple question: What happens when a religious faith becomes intertwined with a particular nation and its political identity?

Christianity is a faith; nationalism is an identity framework

At its most basic level, Christianity concerns a relationship with God through Jesus Christ. Its central concerns include faith, worship, discipleship, repentance, forgiveness, love of neighbor, mercy, justice, reconciliation, and the hope of salvation.

Christianity is therefore not inherently tied to one nationality.

A Christian can be American, Nigerian, Korean, Brazilian, Russian, Indian, Egyptian, German, or any of thousands of other national identities. Christianity existed for many centuries before the United States existed, and Christians today live within virtually every nation and culture on earth.

Nationalism, by contrast, is concerned with the nation: its identity, sovereignty, history, culture, boundaries, and political community.

Christian nationalism occurs when these two spheres become joined in a particular way—when Christianity is understood not merely as a faith practiced by citizens but as an essential component of the nation's identity, political order, or governing authority.

That distinction matters.

A Christian may love her country deeply without believing that the country is Christian in any political sense. A Christian may believe that biblical principles should influence his personal voting decisions without believing that the government should establish Christianity. A Christian may believe that Christian moral convictions belong in public debate while simultaneously defending the religious freedom of people who do not share those convictions.

Those positions involve Christianity and politics. They do not necessarily constitute Christian nationalism.

Where the intersection occurs

There are several points at which Christianity and Christian nationalism can overlap.

1. Shared moral language

Both may appeal to concepts such as family, human dignity, morality, responsibility, sacrifice, justice, charity, and the common good.

A Christian nationalist may interpret these concepts through an explicitly national framework: What kind of nation should America be?

A Christian without a nationalist framework might ask a different question: What does Christian discipleship require of me, regardless of what nation I live in?

The words may be remarkably similar even when the underlying framework is different.

2. A shared concern about the moral direction of society

Christians have always debated the moral character of their societies. Christianity has generated movements for abolition, civil rights, poverty relief, religious liberty, education, prison reform, peace, and countless other causes.

Christian nationalism can likewise involve concern that a nation's moral and cultural direction has departed from Christian principles.

The difference lies partly in what follows from that concern.

Christian faith may lead a person toward evangelism, service, persuasion, charity, community organizing, or personal moral action. Christian nationalism places greater emphasis on the nation's identity and on the role of government and political institutions in preserving or advancing a Christian conception of society.

3. Historical memory

Christianity has profoundly influenced Western history, including American history. Churches, clergy, Christian schools, religious movements, charitable institutions, and biblical language have all played roles in American public life.

Christian nationalism may take those historical connections a step further, interpreting them as evidence that the United States is fundamentally a Christian nation—or that it ought to become one.

That is a historical and political claim rather than a theological definition of Christianity.

And even the phrase "Christian nation" is understood differently by Americans. Pew Research Center found that people who use the term may mean anything from a nation whose citizens generally hold Christian values to a nation in which Christianity receives an institutional or governmental position.

Where the two do not intersect

The differences become clearer when we consider questions of authority.

Christianity does not require a Christian government

Nothing in the definition of Christianity requires a Christian to believe that the state should be officially Christian.

Indeed, Christian communities have existed under monarchies, republics, dictatorships, democracies, empires, and governments hostile to Christianity. The faith itself is not dependent upon a particular political system.

The New Testament also contains an important distinction between the kingdom proclaimed by Jesus and the political kingdoms of this world. Jesus tells Pilate, "My kingdom is not of this world" (John 18:36). Christians have interpreted that statement in different ways, but it has long been part of Christian reflection on the limits of political power.

Christianity does not require a Christian national identity

Christianity is universal in a way nationalism cannot be.

Paul's declaration in Galatians 3:28—that in Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek—was not a statement about abolishing every cultural or national identity. But it did place membership in the Christian community above ethnic distinctions.

Likewise, Revelation portrays people "from every nation, tribe, people and language" gathered together in worship (Revelation 7:9).

A Christian can therefore possess a strong national identity while understanding that national identity is secondary to Christian identity.

Christianity does not require political power

The history of Christianity includes periods in which Christians possessed considerable political power and periods in which they possessed virtually none.

The Christian faith can be practiced without controlling the state.

This distinction becomes especially significant in a constitutional democracy such as the United States. The First Amendment prohibits Congress from establishing a religion while protecting the free exercise of religion. The Constitution also explicitly prohibits religious tests for federal office.

Consequently, American Christians can participate vigorously in political life without requiring the United States itself to become a Christian institution.

The particularly important distinction: influence versus establishment

One of the most confusing areas in this discussion is the difference between Christian influence and Christian establishment.

A Christian citizen may argue for a law because of Christian convictions.

That is ordinary participation in democratic life.

A Christian organization may lobby Congress.

That is also constitutionally protected political activity.

A Christian may vote according to religious convictions.

Again, nothing about that is inherently nationalist.

The more difficult question is whether the government itself should formally privilege Christianity because Christianity is regarded as essential to the nation's identity.

That is where the distinction between Christianity and Christian nationalism becomes much sharper.

Pew's 2026 survey illustrates the range of positions. Seventeen percent of U.S. adults said the federal government should declare Christianity the official religion; 43% said Christianity should not be made official but that the government should promote Christian moral values; and 38% said the government should neither establish Christianity nor promote Christian values.

Those three positions should not simply be collapsed into "Christian" and "non-Christian." They represent different understandings of the relationship between religious conviction and government.

Christians themselves are not a monolith

Perhaps the most important point is that Christianity contains enormous internal diversity.

Catholics, Orthodox Christians, evangelical Protestants, mainline Protestants, Black Protestants, Pentecostals, Anabaptists, Anglicans, and many other Christian traditions have developed different understandings of church, state, citizenship, social responsibility, and political power.

Some Christians emphasize the transformation of society through political action.

Others emphasize separation between church and state.

Some regard government as an important instrument for protecting moral and social goods.

Others are deeply suspicious of political power because they believe that attaching Christianity too closely to political authority can corrupt both.

There is therefore no single "Christian position" on Christian nationalism.

Indeed, the very existence of Christians who reject Christian nationalism demonstrates why the concepts cannot be treated as synonymous.

The danger of reversing the relationship

There is also a conceptual distinction worth considering.

Christianity can ask:

How should a Christian live in this nation?

Christian nationalism tends to ask:

What kind of nation should this nation be because it is—or ought to be—Christian?

Those questions overlap, but they are not the same question.

The first begins with the believer and asks how faith should shape life.

The second begins with the nation and asks how religious identity should shape national life.

That reversal can be consequential.

When Christianity becomes identified with a particular nation, political disagreement can begin to look like religious disagreement. If national identity becomes identified with Christian identity, disagreement with a political program can potentially be interpreted as opposition to Christianity itself.

That is one reason scholars study Christian nationalism as a phenomenon distinct from ordinary Christian belief and ordinary religious participation. Contemporary research generally measures it through combinations of beliefs about national identity, Christianity's role in government, and the relationship between religious authority and political authority.

The intersection is real—but so is the space between them

It is therefore misleading to say either that Christianity and Christian nationalism have nothing to do with one another or that Christian nationalism simply is Christianity.

The relationship is better represented as overlapping circles:

Christianity

  • faith in Christ
  • worship
  • discipleship
  • theology
  • moral teaching
  • Christian community
  • service and charity
  • evangelism
  • spiritual formation

Christian nationalism

  • national identity
  • political authority
  • national history
  • cultural identity
  • government
  • public policy
  • the perceived relationship between Christianity and the nation

The intersection

  • Christian moral convictions applied to public life
  • concern about the nation's moral direction
  • Christian interpretations of national history
  • political activism motivated by Christian belief
  • claims about the role Christianity should play in national identity

But there remains substantial territory belonging to Christianity that is not nationalism—and substantial discussion of nationalism that concerns political identity rather than Christian theology.

Perhaps the most useful question, then, is not simply, "Is Christian nationalism Christian?"

A more revealing set of questions is:

Which teachings of Christianity are being invoked?

What is being claimed about the nation?

Who is included in the national community?

What authority is being assigned to government?

What authority is being assigned to religious belief?

And what happens to people who do not share that belief?

Those questions allow us to examine the intersection without pretending that the two concepts are interchangeable.

Christianity can exist without nationalism.

Nationalism can exist without Christianity.

And when the two meet, the resulting movement must be examined on its own terms rather than assumed to represent Christianity as a whole.

image and reflection provided by AI


post inspired by Jerry Aveta's forthcoming book, Fractured Christianity. On pre-order through Oct 12.

Book description:

Racism and the politicization of Christianity have shaped America since the colonial era, leaving divisions that continue to fracture the nation, its churches, and its communities. In Fractured Christianity: A Republic in Peril, the author draws on a lifetime of service as a federal civil servant, teacher, counselor, and pastor to examine the historical roots of these divisions and their ongoing impact on American life.

More important, he offers a path toward healing grounded in a timeless biblical principle: repentance—the willingness to change one's mind, listen, and seek reconciliation. Rather than arguing over who is right or wrong, readers are challenged to engage in meaningful conversations that bridge differences and restore relationships.
A thought-provoking resource for individuals, study groups, and faith communities seeking understanding, unity, and hope.


Jerry is also the author of the award-winning book, When Liberty Enslaves: The Toxic Blend of Faith and Politics.



Want to know more about Jerry and his books? Click here for more posts.




CONTACT editor@msipress.com FOR A REVIEW COPY


MSI Press, a veteran-owned publishing house based in California, United States
best known for turning new writers into award-winning authors,
has gained mass recognition for releasing highly acclaimed books of varying genres
that are distributed internationally. Check us out on Wikitia.


To purchase copies of any MSI Press book at 25% discount,

use code FF25 at MSI Press webstore;

for free shipping, use code ship4free.

(Codes cannot be used together; they are meant to provide a choice of discount.)



Want to read an MSI Press book and not have to pay for it?
(1) Ask your local library to purchase and shelve it.
(2) Ask us for a review copy; we love to have our books reviewed.


VISIT OUR WEBSITE TO LEARN MORE ABOUT ALL OUR AUTHORS AND TITLES AND TO FOLLOW US ON OUR VARIOUS PLATFORMS.


CONTACT INFO@MSIPRESS.COM TO SBUMIT A BOOK PROPOSAL/MAMUSCRIPT OR TO CONTACT ONE OF OUR AUTHORS.



Sign up for the MSI Press LLC monthly newsletter: get inside information before others see it and access to additional book content
(recent releases, sales/discounts, awards, reviews, Amazon top 100 list, links to precerpts/excerpts, author advice, and more)

Check out recent issues.


 

   

MSI Press is ranked among the top publishers in California.
Check out our rankings -- and more --
HERE.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Guest Post from Dr. Dennis Ortman: Words Matter

In Memoriam: Carl Don Leaver

Eternal Springs wins Literary Titan book award!